wwaddell on May 30th, 2010

As usual, it’s been way too long since I got you caught up on where we are with our own Passive Solar Home design and building project.  Here’s what’s happend since my last update:

The house design:  The floor plan is complete and works out to just over 2200 square feet.  It’s a little larger than we had hoped for, but we needed some extra office space and a 3rd bedroom for our grandkids visits.  That is critical to us!

The Roof Design:  We had the roof design completed, but found a new one recently that isn’t as tall as the original yet gives more focased solar where we need it in the back of the house.  Because of this, we are redoing the roof and back yard area design.

Misc. Details:  We are keeping more of the large trees in the back yard now and placing a few extra on the west side in key locations to protect the home from the late afternoon summer sun.  It shouldn’t affect the winter solar impact on the house at all.

Our next step:  We now have most of the funds secured to get the well dug and the sewer system engineered.  Hoping to break ground early this fall.  Wish us luck!

Wes Waddell

www.BuildingSolarNews.info

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Found this blog post about a modern concrete home design.  The home is beautiful, if not a little large for a lot of families, but it had a lot of great ideas that could be employed in not only my own home design, but in many passive solar home designs.

Here’s the link so you can check it out your self:

http://www.besthousedesign.com/2010/05/17/modern-concrete-homes-design-acero-architect/

Wes Waddell

www.BuildingSolarNews.info

Tags: , , , , ,

wwaddell on August 30th, 2009

Hi Building Solar News reader…

I know, it’s been a while again since our last post.  I’ve actually been reading a lot and learning more so I can better inform you about what it really means to build with both passive and active solar power systems.

To help hold you over, one of my good Twitter friends put together some great material with examples of how solar energy can affect your pocket book.  Here’s what the folks at Real Goods Solar had to say…

——————————————————————————————-

What Solar Can Do for Your Pocketbook

  • Lock in your electricity rates for 30 years – PG&E and other utility company’s rates have been steadily increasing by about 6.7% a year, with a 30% jump in the last three years alone.
  • The pre-tax IRR over 25 years in most cases averages around 10-15% — far better and far safer than the stock market, bond market, money markets, and long-term CDs.
  • Increase your home’s value by $20 for every $1 reduction in annual utility bills, according to the National Appraisal Institute. And, your property tax won’t increase even one cent.
  • Since you only pay us the After-Rebate Price, without having to wait for your state rebate to process, you experience the savings right away!

The average homeowner will spend more than $100,000 on electric bills over 25 years. Why rent when you can own? Following is an overview of the costs associated with purchasing a solar system….

Get the whole article on their BLOG at:

http://www.realgoodssolar.com/solar/ecs/main/Economics.html

——————————————————————————————

Kathy and I are currently looking at adding solar panels to our 38 foot Rexhall Aerbus motor home.  We’ll let you know what we find out and how that goes…

Until then, keep your eyes on the sun.

Wes

www.BuildingSolarNews.info

Tags: , , , , , , ,

wwaddell on July 24th, 2009

Renewable Energy Grants and Credits thrugh the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Renewable Credits Program

Unless you’re totally new to the idea of renewable geothermal, solar and wind energy in the last few months, you should already be aware of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.  The ARRA, which provides billions designed to restart the sagging economy is your best friend when it comes to renewable geothermal, solar and wind power energy credits.

Under Section 1603 of the Act, Congress has authorized the issuance of direct grants instead of tax credits for renewable energy projects placed into service or begun in 2009 or 2010. The only draw back is that the grants are for businesses only!  BIG FAILURE on congress’ part in my book.  With that, the Department of Energy just issued guidance on how the program is supposed to work.

For those who might be interested in developing renewable solar, wind or geothermal energy for “commercial” projects, these grants will help to defray some of the initial costs of aquiring, shipping and installing these renewable energy technologies.

This program is set up to provide “up to” $3 billion for specific types of renewable energy type projects. Grants for 30 percent of the total costs (including installation parts and labor) are available for a variety of renewable energy projects.  Eligible “Large” renewable energy projects include large wind turbines, biomass, landfill gas, hydropower, and solar panel (photovoltaic) facilities. Grants of ten percent are also available for small scale wind, geothermal, and combined heat and power projects.

While the Department of Energy is not yet accepting any applications as of this writing… payments for the grants will be made within 60 days of receipt of the approved application or after the date the project is placed into service, whichever is later.

We were able to find a sample application for those of our readers that are interested in getting a head start in the applicant process and to use in review.  This way you can begin collecting the required renewable energy information necessary in oder for you to obtain the energy grants.

Note: The grant recipients when approved cannot also accept tax credits for the same project.

In this way, the Obama Administration and the Department of Energy hope to stimulate the development of renewable energy projects and the economy by providing cash directly, instead of requiring developers to wait for tax credits that may never be used.

You have to get started now though as the window of opportunity for these Renewable Energy grants is limited. Projects must be placed in service in 2009 or 2010 and applications cannot be submitted after October 1, 2011.

All of which is subject to change at government will… so what else is new!

More updates to follow,

Wes Waddell

www.BuildingSolarNews.info

Tags: , , , , , , ,

wwaddell on July 11th, 2009

Power-Save Products

The Power-Save 1200, 3200 and 3400 conditioning units have been lowering consumer electric bills by as much as 25% for nearly four years.  The technology has long been used in industrial/commercial applications, but the rapid rise in home electricity costs has created unprecedented consumer demand.  The Power-Save units work by conditioning the inductive motor load and correcting the power factor back to 1, or as close as possible.

The Power-Save Solar Attic Fan and Power-Save Radiant Barrier are simple and proven methods for reducing your heating and cooling loads in a typical house. The fan removes hot air from the attic keeping your home cooler. Installing the Power-Barrier Radiant Barrier eliminates 95% of heat gains into the house through the roof/attic. The Power-Save Radiant Barrier combined with our aluminum foil seam tape created the Power-Save Duct Seal System.  These three products along with our Power-Save 1200 make up our Energy Saving Kit.  The energy kit is so effective that we guarantee your customers will save 35% on their electric bill or we will refund the purchase price.

Power-Save Solar kits are the energy of today!  By making solar truly affordable and accessible, Power-Save has made it possible for everyone to reduce or eliminate electric bills while improving the quality of our environment.  Power-Save has complete, consumer-ready solar systems designed to simplify the process for the end-user and provide the most cost-effective solar solutions on the market.  Power-Save carries three grid tied solar kits: 1kw, 2kw and 3kw that include the inverter, racking system and 1-PS1200.  In many states, government incentives and rebates may offset your purchase price entirely!

The Power-Save HID Light Manager controls any ballast-based, gaseous discharge lighting system. This includes Mercury Vapor, Metal Halide, High and Low Pressure Sodium. One unit can reduce the energy consumption of one, ten, 100 or even 400 lighting fixtures and the savings can be measured within 20 minutes after the lights turn on!  The Power-Save HID Light Manager improves energy efficiency, reduces operating costs, and maximizes profits. 

The Power-Save Universal Control Device (UCD-1) is a solution for dimming and controlling fluorescent light sources.  The device enables you to control the light level providing more comfort and energy savings for all environments.  This Power-Save patented technology is for controlling all compact fluorescent lights (non-dimmable and dimmable) and fluorescent linear tubes (T12, T8, T5, circular) with non-dimmable ballasts.

Tags: , , ,

wwaddell on June 30th, 2009

GARY REID SAVES 20% ON HIS ELECTRIC BILL IN FIRST MONTH WITH THE POWER-SAVE 1200!

“I installed my Power-Save 1200 unit on June 6, 2009 and here are the results:

June 2007 I used 3421 kwh at a cost of $378.80

June 2008 I used 3230 kwh at a cost of $353.44

June 2009 I used 2582 kwh at a cost of $288.40

That’s a savings of 20% for my June billing cycle!” – Gary Reid of Naples, Florida

 

Tags: ,

wwaddell on April 19th, 2009

Hi Solar Friend,

I know it’s been quite a while since I’ve updated my BLOG with our progress. Not much to tell until today…

We are still working on closing on the property so that we can begin putting in the utilities and upgrading the road for access. So, until today, there just wasn’t much to tell accept it’s a long waiting game in this recession and hard to find financing world.

We did get a new survey done before the snow fell heavy here, more than 4 feet this year. We thought we were all ready to go…

We knew that one of the neighbors didn’t like the survey as he thought that he owned about 3 feet more than he did. But, after we did the legal letter swapping, he knew that he had not a leg to stand on and we thought it was done with. The key word was thought!

We went out to take some photos now that the snow is gone and spring is working it’s magic. What we found made us very sad.

You see, not only did the original neighbor pull up the survey stakes on the west side, but the neighbor on the south side got into the act and used his tractor to plow right over the stake and the concrete filled vinyle fence post that marked it. See the photo:

Survey Stake Vandles

Survey Stake Vandles

Now, we are fighting with 2 neighbors and they will both have a bill coming from the surveyor of approximately $1200 to redo the survey of the property.

(I look for that to go to small claims court in at least one of the two)

The only bright point is that since we haven’t closed and it’s still in the other guys name, the battle is technically with him and not with us. Hopefully that will be enough that once the property is marked again, fenced off and sold to us, they will not hold the grudge over our heads too.

Some people just don’t know how to act and it seems that even just 3 feet of land is something that brings out the worst in people.

Our lesson learned and our word to the wise…

If you are buying open land that has never been fenced off and has liberal boundries, then plan for some good old fashioned scuffling to happen over who owns what. Avoid it if you can, but if the property is really what you want, you are just going to have to do like they did in the old west and fight for what is yours.

Until next time,

Wes Waddell
www.BuildingSolarNews.info  BLOG

Tags: , , , , ,

wwaddell on March 30th, 2009

We found this artcle on www.RVersOnline.org and found it to be very informative to not only those that wish to add solar to their RV, 5th Wheel or Motorhome, but to those learning about solar power in general and applying that information to Complete Solar Panel Systems that are Grid Tied to their homes.

As we told you we would pass on all the info we learn about on our journey to building our own Passive/Active Solar Dream Home…

———————————————————————————————

IS THERE AN INVERTER IN YOUR FUTURE?



With our purchase of a new 5th Wheel, we acquired as well a dose of new technology which we’re planning to put to good use soon in the Southwest deserts. Our ’96 Alpenlite came equipped with a 2,000 watt Heart Interface Inverter, and a single roof-mounted solar panel. Being justly accused of having a slight case of technophobia, I of course eagerly read all of the documentation which came with the new equipment. It didn’t take long to discover that the Inverter is a very complex system; and that if we wanted to use the new inverter system to full advantage, we’d need acquire a bit more knowledge about inverters.

Fortunately I was invited by our local Alpenlite dealer to sit in on a seminar being provided by a manufacturer’s representative for Heart Inverters. While the presentation was primarily to help the dealer’s sales and service personnel understand the operation and capabilities of the system, it proved to be of considerable value as a consumer education session as well. While this writer would hold out no expertise in the nuances of electricity, it seemed useful to summarize some of the key items which were covered in this interesting class. Likely it will help provide other RVers with a better understanding of power inverter system, and at least provide a starting point for evaluating the advantage of such sytems.

Power inverters are becoming more common in RVs because of the changing demands of RV owners. Whether an inverter is “right for you” depends entirely upon one’s RV lifestyle. For the RVer who always picks a site with full utility hookups, the inverter still offers some advantages — but it would be far more difficult to justify. For most RVers, however, who either occasionally or mostly find themselves visiting sites which don’t provide electrical hookups, a power inverter is definitely worth considering — particularly in conjunction with one or more solar panels. Using the Alpenlite scheme as a model for illustrative purposes, let’s explore the basics of what the system is and what if offers.

Our unit comes equipped with 4 “Group 27″ deep cycle RV batteries. These offer 110 amp hours each, for a total capacity of 440 amp hours. The inverter’s basic purpose is to efficiently convert DC power from the battery bank to usable alternating (AC) power for use onboard the coach. The most fundamental question, of course, is “how much is enough”? There is predictably no cookie-cutter answer. There are interrelated issues of RV lifestyle, solar power, generator availability, and individual “power consumption” needs. What is clear is that it’s fairly easy to calculate precisely how much power (amp/hours) will be consumed by adding together the power requirements of all electric appliances which will be used on a typical day.

The power consumption of each appliance is stated somewhere on the appliance itself, and is expressed in terms of AC watts or AC amps. What the RVer really wants to know, however, is neither AC watts or AC amps. The RVer contemplating an inverter system wants to know what the equivalent is in DC amps, because that’s what the battery bank is supplying. Where an appliance’s power consumption is expressed in terms of AC watts, one can use a simple formula to calculate the equivalent power expressed in DC amps:

 

DC Amps = AC Watts / 12 volts

Example: A TV set with a 100 (AC) watt rating used for one hour would consume 9.17 DC amps.

Where the appliance is rated in AC Amps, use the formula:

DC Amps = AC Amps x 10 x 1.1 x (hours of use)

By adding together one’s projected hours of appliance use (TV, coffeemaker, AC lamps, etc., it’s fairly easy to calculate the projected DC amp needs on a daily basis. This represents the “draw down” on the battery bank. Naturally the bigger the “bank”, the longer one can go without recharging the batteries.

In estimating how much battery power is needed, there are some interesting common sense considerations. It’s fairly easy to visualize that if one uses a TV rated at 100 AC watts (which we’ve already calculated is approximately 9 DC amps), that watching two hours of TV daily will consume about 18 amp/hrs. But evaluating an electric coffee maker requires just a bit more thought. A typical coffee maker is rated somewhere around 1000 (AC) watts. Thus in 15 minutes, one can calculate that the coffee maker will take about 23 amp/hrs from the battery bank. But just leaving the coffee pot on its warming plate for the balance of a full hour could drain a much higher number of amp/hrs from the batteries. That’s quite a bit of energy for that wakeup refreshment. When we made that calculation we discarded our old RV coffee maker, and purchased a new model which finishes its brew cycle well under 10 minutes (i.e., less than 16 DC amps), and then turns itself off! Meantime, the coffee is goes directly into the unit’s well insulated carafe which will keep it piping hot for far longer than it takes us to consume it.

A note about solar power seems appropriate here, since it’s the boondocker’s only option (short of a generator) to put some amp/hrs back into the batteries. A good quality solar panel can deliver approximately 3 amps of power during daylight hours. A conservative estimate for sunny weather might be 6 “good” hours of full solar power daily — and somewhat more in southerly lattitudes and/or during the longer summer days. Thus one panel would put roughly 18 amps back into the batteries; 2 panels 36 amps; and 3 panels 52 amps See our separate article about RV solar energy for more detail on this.

Assuming no other source of recharging the batteries (i.e. utility hookup or generator), the net result of a dry camping day’s activity on the battery pack will be the difference between the total amp/hrs, computed as we’ve described above, and the total amp/hrs “in” from a solar source. If one consumed 50 amp/hrs during the day, and had two solar panels which added back approximately 36 amps, the net drain on the battery pack would be 14 amps for that day. If the total battery “pool” were 440 amps one can begin to get a handle on how many days away from hookukps are possible. However…

There is one important caveat: The literature suggests that a conservative rule of thumb is to count on getting only 50% of the rated amp hour rating for the battery bank — and only up to 80% under perfect conditions. This is apparently due to various factors, including temperature, battery condition, and the degree to which the inverter is able to convert from DC to AC efficiently. “Efficiency” is defined as the loss of amps due to the process of changing it from DC to AC current. The unit which we have is rated between 84-93% “efficient”, which we understand to be quite a good rating.

There seems to be another reason for “counting on” only 50% of your total battery bank capacity. Deep cycle batteries reportedly will perform considerably longer service if they are recharged considerably before they are almost fully depleted. Thus batteries which are regularly recharged after approximatey 50% depletion will last much longer than batteries which are almost completely discharged on each “cycle”. This seems reason enough to consider 50% of one’s rated capacity as a good rule of thumb in determining how many amp hours are “available”.

The other function performed by the Heart Interface product we have is that it acts as a battery charger. But it is hardly a traditional battery charger. A conventional charger provides a “taper charge”. This results in slow charging due to the continued tapering of the output current. A typical 60 amp taper charger is said to be capable of delivering only about 12 amps at 13.3 volts. If the battery bank is substantially discharged, it would take a long time to bring our bank of four batteries back to full charge. Moreover, once the battery bank is fully charged, the taper charge continues to charge at a voltage which is really too high for just “maintenance” purposes, and can cause excessive water loss.

The Heart Inverter provides three distinct charging rates, applying a “bulk” charge at 100 amps; then dropping to a lesser rate as the voltage increases in the battery bank; and finally applying a “float” charge just sufficient to maintain the batteries in a fully charged condition. The result is much faster recharging of the batteries, either from shore power or from the motorhome or tow vehicle alternator. What this means is that driving for just a few hours can sigificantly restore a depleted battery bank. There are nuances about alternator types and aftermarket products (including one from Heart) which can ensure top performance, but these topics are beyond the scope of this introductory article.

Perhaps the most interesting piece of the inverter/charger puzzle is the remote monitor and control mechanism which is mounted inside the coach. The unit which we have performs a wide range of functions pertaining to both the inverter and charger functions. It also has the basic “on/off” switch for the inverter. When “on”, the control panel provides information about such things as: whether the the unit is operating in inverter or charger mode; if inverter mode, the present level of amps being consumed, and the present voltage under that load. If in the charger mode, it shows the present level of the amps in, along with the voltage at which it is being charged; and various warning functions pertaining to overheating and overloads.

In addition, the remote has 8 dip switches which provide special settings for particular needs. For instance, switch number 4 controls whether the inverter will act as a battery charger when the inverter is off. Its default setting contemplates it should do so. However, if a small generator were in use to run some electric appliances, an RVer might well want to turn the “charger” function off by turning the inverter off. This would preclude the small generator’s output from being consumed entirely in attempting to deliver a high amp charge to the batteries — likely forcing most small generators to shut down. Other switches provide for differences in outside temperatures, and for the use of different types of batteries — e.g., wet cell versus gel cell batteries.

There is optionally available a digital remote panel (called “Link 2000″) which provides more precise information (simply because it is digital, versus the Freedom Remote panel’s LED lights which show, for instance amps in 10 amp increments). Reportedly it is also more accurate, because it takes its readings from additional information sources. It has the added ability to show the cumulative DC amps used since the last recharge — which is probably the most important bit of information an RVer could have. A supplementary single purpose digital readout (the “Link 100″) can be added to the “Freedom” remote panel, and provides the same “amps/hrs used” information.

The mechanics of how inverters operate are far too complex to cover in this short article. And we have not attempted to capture more than the basic information here. These systems are sufficiently complex that one needs to understand and consider the many features they offer when selecting a unit. Clearly this is not a “one size fits all” choice. Especially important is the need to consider the implications of one’s RV lifestyle in determining whether an inverter would be a useful resource; and if so, what the needed characteristics and specifications of the system should be.

For further information about inverter/charger systems we think you would find the brochure prepared by Heart Interface to be of interest. You may wish to check their web site.

Post Script: We subsequently modified our own RV by adding an additional 3 amp hour solar panel, and adding the Link 10 monitor to give us precise information about amp/hours remaining in the battery bank. We also swapped out the simple “on-off” type voltage regulator for unit which uses the newer “pulse width modulation” technology. Both were significant improvements to the original system.

Author Info: For more great information on Solar and RVs… Check out the pages of www.RVersOnline.org

Tags: , ,

wwaddell on March 28th, 2009

Washington D.C., Feb 17, 2009 – American Recovery and Reinvestment Act – $787 Billion stimulus package signed into law by the Obama administration. Some of the money is even earmarked for Alternative Energy programs.

 

So, what does this news mean to those of us in Washington state that are looking to add one of the Alternative Energy sources to our homes to try and offset the never ending  rise in energy costs our utility companies are heaping on us?

 

In cast you didn’t know, Washington state has had an incentive for residents that supplement their energy with alternative sources like solar for a few years now.  The state, through participating utility providers, will reimburse 12 cents per KwH that you collect from alternative energy sources through June 30, 2014. Unfortunately, this only applies to residents that are using grid tied (hooked to the main power grid) systems.  Off grid systems are not eligible.

 

While Washington state’s incentive is not much and doesn’t come close to comparing to what other states are doing to promote alternative energy, it can add up over time.

 

Now, if you add the 30% tax deduction (of both cost of materials and installation) that the new stimulus package adds in for home owners, you now have the best deal Washington state residents have ever seen on alternative energy packages. There’s never been a better time in Washington state to add solar or wind power to your home.

 

Note: The 30% only applies to solar, wind and fuel cell power. You get 10% for geo thermal heat pumps.

 

With the help of the new stimulus package, it’s now a three part savings plan… first, you reduce your energy bill and save by reducing the power you purchase from the profiteering utility companies, next – Uncle Sam gives you a 30% tax write off and finally, the state kicks in and pays you 12 cents per KwH for all the power you generate.

 

With all that in play, even a small system could have a very large impact on reducing your total energy bill.

 

This means that you have the option to start small with just a few solar panels and then add on later when you can.  Most solar panels now carry a 25 year warranty. That means that if you pay off the system within even as long as 10 years – you still have another 15 or more years of FREE energy coming.

 

Building a new home?  Then including solar and/or wind should be a priority for you as you can add the cost right into the home loan and see the most benefit from the energy gain as well and increase the value of your home from the start.  Even if you are not building new… Including alternative energy sources as part of your homes remodel and updates should be a priority.  Now more than ever, the incentives are in place to help make your new solar or wind power system a reality.

 

The time is coming that all homes include alternative energy sources.  Why not be one of the originals that see the future is hear now.

 

Even if you’re not in Washington State… Check your states incentives out.  I think you’ll find now is the best of times to add al

 

Wes Waddell is currently in the process of building his own Passive and Active solar dream home on 15 acres in Washington States east side.  Follow along with everything he learns and does on his www.BuildingSolarNews.info BLOG.

Tags: , ,

Hi Building Solar News friend,

 

Don’t get me wrong, I love the fact that the Obama administration has set aside more than $787 Billion in stimulus of which some of that includes renewable energy grants. It’s a positive step forward.  It beats the $2K limit that was there hands down.

 

My problem comes in that it does little for the lower and middle class who need the help most with the ever increasing costs of energy.  You see, while the new alternative energy program is giving 30% of the cost of both materials and installation as a cash grant to businesses direct from the Dept. of Treasury… Private citizens that wish to do the same are only allowed to take a 30% cost of materials and installation cost Tax Deduction.

 

No outright grants for home owners at all!

 

For those of you that aren’t good with numbers, I’m going to show you what that really means.

 

Business buys a $30,000.00 solar system including parts and installation.  Uncle Sam gives them $9000.00 cash direct from the US Treasury to help pay the bill.

 

30,000 – 9,000 (30%) = $21,000 paid for the system after the government grant.

 

Now, let’s look at what happens to the private citizen who buys the same system.

 

30,000 system = 9,000 tax deduction.  If your taxable income was 50,000 and you were in the 20% tax bracket, that would mean that…

 

50,000 @ 20% tax = 10,000 in taxes.  50,000 – 9,000 = 41,000 @ 20% tax = 8200 in taxes.

 

In other words, while the business got a $9,000.00 grant, the private home owner only sees $1,800.00 in real tax break.  Again, while it’s better than the $2,000.00 limit that it used to be for the total deduction… the new policy really only gives home owners a few hundred dollars more than it used to.

 

That’s not anywhere close to what is needed for most home owners to afford the cost of alternative energy sources such as solar, wind or geo thermal. The new policy just leaves private citizens holding the bill for not only the stimulus package itself… but for any alternative energy systems they might wish to use themselves.

 

Wes Waddell

 

www.BuildingSolarNews.info BLOG

www.SpidersMarketingWeb.com

 

 

Tags: ,